From Tariffs To Terrorism, BRICS Delivers Tough Message To West As India Secures Key Consensus

New Delhi: The differences were so deep that at one point it seemed the declaration might stall completely, but India ultimately prevailed. The New Delhi Declaration was released right after the first session of the 18th BRICS summit. It comprised 45 pages and 140 points—the result of an all-night brainstorming session by Indian officials.

Where exactly was the sticking point?

In fact, there is a rule in BRICS: nothing moves forward unless everyone agrees. If even a single country digs in its heels, the entire process can derail. This time, the hurdle arose over the paragraph concerning West Asia.

Iran and the UAE clashed over whether or not to explicitly name the United States in the context of the attacks on Iran. Iran wanted a direct mention of the US, while the UAE objected to it. Hours of debate ensued over this single line.

Negotiations went on all night; how was it finally resolved?

By the evening of September 11, 90% of the work was done, but that remaining 10% proved to be the most challenging. The Indian team worked tirelessly until 2:45 AM. A new draft was then circulated to all parties. Separate discussions were held with Russia and China, and the other nations were brought on board. Finally, at 3:30 PM, everyone gave their consent, and at 4:00 PM, PM Modi personally announced from the stage that the declaration was ready.

How did BRICS respond to Western nations regarding tariffs and CBAM?

BRICS took a bold stance this time. Arbitrary US tariffs and European measures like the CBAM (a 'green tax') were explicitly termed discriminatory.

It was stated that such rules would cripple developing nations. Therefore, WTO reforms are essential to ensure that the voices of poor and emerging economies are heard.

What does the declaration say about the Pahalgam attack?

The events of April 22, 2025, in Pahalgam were condemned in the strongest terms. Twenty-six innocent lives were lost in that attack.

The declaration clearly states: there is no excuse for terrorism. Cross-border movement of terrorists must cease, their funding channels must be blocked, and their hideouts must be targeted. And yes, it is wrong to link terrorism to any specific religion.

What is the BRICS stance on the turmoil in West Asia?

All nations have acknowledged the deteriorating situation and emphasised the need for restraint. They agreed that gunfire achieves nothing and that dialogue is the only way forward.

Concerns were also raised regarding threats involving nuclear weapons. There was a call to avoid targeting civilians and civilian infrastructure and to respect the sovereignty of national borders.

What was said regarding Gaza and Palestine?

Opposition was expressed against the ongoing violence in Gaza—even following the ceasefire—and the forced eviction of people from their homes.

BRICS reiterated its long-standing position: the creation of an independent Palestinian state with East Jerusalem as its capital, based on the pre-1967 borders. It also called for Palestine to be granted full membership in the UN.

Was there any progress regarding India's bid for a UNSC seat?

Support was evident on paper. The declaration states that UNSC reform is essential and that major economies like India and Brazil should play a more significant role.

However, the reality is that China remains silent on the issue of India's permanent membership.

What happened to the idea of a BRICS currency?

There was no mention of it whatsoever. India's Sherpa, Shambhu Kumaran, confirmed that the topic of a common currency was not discussed at all.

The current focus is on boosting trade in local currencies instead of the US dollar and integrating the respective payment systems of the member nations.